<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>liquid parallaxgoogle | liquid parallax</title>
	<atom:link href="http://liquidparallax.com/tag/google/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://liquidparallax.com</link>
	<description>i am music, feel my waves.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Jan 2012 05:30:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Enhance your Music Searching</title>
		<link>http://liquidparallax.com/2008/12/26/enhance-your-music-searching/</link>
		<comments>http://liquidparallax.com/2008/12/26/enhance-your-music-searching/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Dec 2008 00:37:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Joey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Advice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Free-Stuff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[album]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[artists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[badongo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bands]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Corinne Bailey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dilandau]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[download]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[downloads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[espew]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hypemachine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet player]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mediafire]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[megaupload]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mp3s]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[music search engine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[preview songs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rapidshare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search result]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[seeqpod]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[skreemr]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SONG-ORIENTED]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[zshare]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://liquidparallax.com/?p=399</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Searching for free music – I&#8217;ve done it before, but things change and I get smarter (hopefully). Trying to get a digital copy of a song or album? Look no further. I&#8217;ve found the latest and best online tools to get you right to your goal. Instead of previewing 30 second samples or scrounging through the lost and found known as the internet, you can pretty easily obtain or dip your ears in future music purchases. Do you want to discover that band, but your local music store doesn&#8217;t have it and you don&#8217;t know anyone or any website that offers sampling capabilities? With the right help you can just search for the latest release or the undiscovered gem you&#8217;ve been craving or retrieve downloads that you have legal access to. In most cases, downloading albums for permanent archiving is illegal, so be aware of copyright laws. These searches are powerful and can scrape legal and illegal mp3s and archives. Be respectful of songs and albums and know when they are rightfully free and available. Now choose your route depending on whether you want a song or an entire album: SONG-ORIENTED Dilandau Convenient and thorough search with easy listening and [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://liquidparallax.com/2008/12/26/enhance-your-music-searching/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google goes Search Wiki</title>
		<link>http://liquidparallax.com/2008/10/28/google-goes-search-wiki/</link>
		<comments>http://liquidparallax.com/2008/10/28/google-goes-search-wiki/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 14:04:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Joey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Customize]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search entry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SearchWiki]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[simplicity]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://liquidparallax.com/?p=371</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Just when you thought Google was satisfied with search simplicity, it now has another way of mining data on a massive scale, hopefully to improve the results of their searches. I just stumbled across this in the morning, and I&#8217;m not sure if this is a permanent public module or not. There are two new buttons next to each search entry, Promote and Remove. There&#8217;s even a new commenting bit for every single result. I&#8217;m a little weary to jump in on all of this though. Do I really need to manually weed through results to get what I want in the future? If you choose to participate by clicking those links (must have a Google account), they offer this warning: Customize your search results with your rankings, deletions, and notes — plus, see how other people using Google have tailored their searches. Please remember that your SearchWiki notes will be visible to other users, identified with your Google Account nickname. You will also see this on the bottom of the page: See all my SearchWiki notes &#8211; See all notes for this SearchWiki You can apparently add results, but who knows if this will contribute to the overall pagerank [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://liquidparallax.com/2008/10/28/google-goes-search-wiki/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Anonymous Google Searching with Blingo</title>
		<link>http://liquidparallax.com/2007/08/08/anonymous-google-searching-with-blingo/</link>
		<comments>http://liquidparallax.com/2007/08/08/anonymous-google-searching-with-blingo/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Aug 2007 21:38:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Joey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Assorted]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[anything]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blingo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cookie]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[direct search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[firefox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[popular search engines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search bar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search histories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[site]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[yahoo msn]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://liquidparallax.com/2007/08/08/anonymous-google-searching-with-blingo/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[No need to fear for your life or anything, but it&#8217;s always nice to know that everyone who uses Google has a cookie that expires 2038. The cookie is not edible, but it will track your use on the site and log your entire search history. Google has allegedly indicated that they won&#8217;t be deleting user&#8217;s search histories. This doesn&#8217;t really bother me, because they can do whatever they like as long as it says so in their terms of service. Google has obtained many useful tools online and some would rather give up their privacy than give up using google. There is nothing wrong with that. Other set up proxies which are a pain to set up for newbies and make websurfing slower. Websites like one I found via gHacks can be used to bypass direct search snooping. The best solution that I am using is going through Blingo which offers prizes for using Google through their site. Here&#8217;s an invite to Blingo which will allow you to win prizes for signing up. Without registering, they cannot send you anything without an address. Otherwise, you can still use blingo to anonymize your searching habits because Google has no way [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://liquidparallax.com/2007/08/08/anonymous-google-searching-with-blingo/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google Key Words Don&#8217;t Unlock Doors</title>
		<link>http://liquidparallax.com/2007/07/23/google-key-words-dont-unlock-doors/</link>
		<comments>http://liquidparallax.com/2007/07/23/google-key-words-dont-unlock-doors/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jul 2007 11:01:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Joey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Assorted]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web-Design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[imperfect]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[keyword_ranking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[searches_engines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[seo]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://liquidparallax.com/2007/07/23/google-key-words-dont-unlock-doors/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[SEO and keyword ranking is a big deal to white collar internerds, but I look at it as an arbitrary location up to google to shuffle around. I don&#8217;t need to be on the front page for the search 11 best 2007 (notice the permalink to that page is /ten-best-places-to-search-free-music/, although I changed the title). Yet other searches don&#8217;t reach my site, but other searches engines do. In a perfect world, we wouldn&#8217;t need to search for anything. We&#8217;d have it already. Google is here to keep it imperfect. That&#8217;s why those key words fail to open the doors. It&#8217;s up to virtual construction workers to build doors that stay open.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://liquidparallax.com/2007/07/23/google-key-words-dont-unlock-doors/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>MySpace Masks Links for Spam</title>
		<link>http://liquidparallax.com/2007/07/04/myspace-masks-links-for-spam/</link>
		<comments>http://liquidparallax.com/2007/07/04/myspace-masks-links-for-spam/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jul 2007 10:50:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Joey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web-Design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[myspace]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spam]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[text_link]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[usability]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://liquidparallax.com/2007/07/04/myspace-masks-links-for-spam/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;m not sure when they did it since I&#8217;m not a constant user, but MySpace has come out with another flawed improvement on their site. All external links are hidden behind msplinks.com redirects. What does this mean? Well, when you hover over a link that leaves myspace, you&#8217;ll see in your status bar a link to http://www.msplinks.com/randomstring1Y29tLw== instead of the actual site. Tom&#8217;s reasoning for this is to deter spammers from linking because the redirect can intercept the URL if it is spam. Another reason they are doing this is to look better in the eyes of Google and to disassociate with bad neighborwebs. Sites that link to spam or are related to spam in some way are knocked down in their standing. Although it means well, this is a big step backwards from a web design and usability standpoint. I think it an essential feature of internet browsing that I can preview the location of a page. Now when I want to click a link, I don&#8217;t know if where it will take me. So now I must rely on myspace&#8217;s judgment to decide for me. And to top it all off, now users are going to behave differently [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://liquidparallax.com/2007/07/04/myspace-masks-links-for-spam/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Reasons to Be Cautious of Google</title>
		<link>http://liquidparallax.com/2007/02/18/reasons-to-be-cautious-of-google/</link>
		<comments>http://liquidparallax.com/2007/02/18/reasons-to-be-cautious-of-google/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Feb 2007 03:21:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Joey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cautious]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[censorship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conspiracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[corporate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stake]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://liquidparallax.com/2007/02/18/reasons-to-be-cautious-of-google/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Google is getting too powerful for the internet. I&#8217;m not a conspiracy theorist, and in fact use some Google services, but that doesn&#8217;t mean we should all turn a blind eye to what Google is and is capable of. Google has one of the best search engines, any they also have a wealth of knowledge. As the internet has grown, so has Google. Google owns or has acquired a stake in 33 companies from 2001 to 2006, and they have already bought 2 companies in 2007. Maybe their plans are to buy 1 up-and-coming company a month. They forked over $1 billion to obtain 5% equity in AOL. They also bought out Youtube, their competing video site, for $1.65 billion. Instead of trying to improve their own online video service, they squelch the competition. Google swallows creativity. It doesn&#8217;t destroy it, but merely obtains (buys) the rights to innovative web applications, services, and other intellectual properties. Think about what Google knows about you: If you&#8217;ve ever searched on Google, visited a blogger blog, pages with Adsense ads, or pages that use Google Analytics, then you have cookie that expires in 2038, unless you have deleted it manually. Google knows what [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://liquidparallax.com/2007/02/18/reasons-to-be-cautious-of-google/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google Gets it Backwards</title>
		<link>http://liquidparallax.com/2006/10/06/google-gets-it-backwards/</link>
		<comments>http://liquidparallax.com/2006/10/06/google-gets-it-backwards/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Oct 2006 19:44:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Joey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Fun-Sites]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Humor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dyslexic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mirror]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search_engine]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://liquidparallax.com/2006/10/06/google-gets-it-backwards/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Something&#8217;s wrong with Google search today. Google is moving backwards with user accessibility. It&#8217;s like they are literally retreating into the past. They are going back to their stone aged ways. Their search engine has turned around for the worst. Google needs to look at itself in the mirror and realize what has happened. I consulted my dyslexic friends and am still left without answers. And what is elgooG?]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://liquidparallax.com/2006/10/06/google-gets-it-backwards/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google Moon and the US Flag?</title>
		<link>http://liquidparallax.com/2006/10/03/google-moon-and-the-us-flag/</link>
		<comments>http://liquidparallax.com/2006/10/03/google-moon-and-the-us-flag/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Oct 2006 05:46:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Joey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Amusing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Humor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cheesy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[moon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://liquidparallax.com/2006/10/03/google-moon-and-the-us-flag/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you zoom in all the way on Google Moon, you&#8217;ll be able to find out what is really on the lunar surface. I&#8217;m sorry if that&#8217;s a little cheesy.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://liquidparallax.com/2006/10/03/google-moon-and-the-us-flag/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

